ArticleBMC health services research2026
Implementation of centering-based antenatal group care in flanders (Belgium): experiences of women and health care providers; modalities for sustainable integration into the health care system.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn Belgium, antenatal care is characterized by one-to-one care; with limited integration of community-based approaches. Centering-Based Group Care (CBGC), derived from the CenteringPregnancy® model, offers an alternative by combining clinical follow-up, health education, and peer support in group sessions. This study focuses on the experiences of participants and facilitators with the implementation of CBGC in three Flemish cities (Aalst, Gent, Leuven) as part of the European Union GC_1000 project. We explored the experience regarding the implementation process along with factors influencing sustainable integration into the health care system.
methodsA total of 193 women participated in 30 CBGC trajectories between 2021 and 2023. A realist evaluation design was applied, using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide thematic analysis. Data were collected through interviews, focus groups, and observations(n = 8) involving participants (n = 6), facilitators (n = 13), and stakeholders (n = 13).
resultsWomen reported high satisfaction with CBGC, highlighting four key benefits: (1) social support and connection, (2) active involvement in care, (3) enhanced learning and empowerment, and (4) continuity and trust in care relationships. Facilitators emphasized the model’s potential to improve quality of care, promote professional growth, and foster interprofessional collaboration. Challenges addressed included language barriers, recruitment difficulties, time constraints, and limited system-level support. Structural barriers such as fragmented care pathways and lack of reimbursement mechanisms hindered full integration in the health care system. Successful implementation was supported by trained facilitators, engaged coordinators, and local partnerships.
conclusionsCBGC is a feasible and valued model of antenatal care in Belgium. It enhances participant engagement, peer learning, and relational care. Sustainable integration requires policy-level support, structural alignment between primary and hospital care, and appropriate funding mechanisms. Expanding CBGC as a potential option to the broad population and embedding it within integrated care pathways could strengthen its impact and sustainability. This study contributes to the growing evidence base supporting group antenatal care as a promising model for improving care experiences, integrated care and preventive community health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.