ArticleBMC nursing2026
Artificial intelligence literacy and related factors among nursing undergraduates in Northeast China.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A study on the current status and associated factors of artificial intelligence literacy among undergraduate nursing students.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a potential shortage of information-based teaching resources in Northeast China, and the artificial intelligence literacy of nursing undergraduates and related factors are not clear.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional survey study conducted in the northeastern region of China. In this study, 546 nursing undergraduates were studied. The data was collected through a mobile app-based survey in October 2024. We assessed demographic factors and artificial intelligence literacy.
resultsThe total score of artificial intelligence literacy of nursing undergraduates was 134.40 ± 4.38. Regression analysis showed that gender, monthly household income, attitude towards artificial intelligence, and whether or not participating in artificial intelligence-related education/training had a significant negative effect on artificial intelligence literacy (p < .05).
conclusionsIt is recommended to formulate effective measures in combination with relevant factors to improve the artificial intelligence literacy of nursing undergraduates in areas with a potential shortage of information-based teaching resources and promote the digital transformation of nursing undergraduates’ future careers. CLINIC TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.