ArticleBMC medical education2026
Learning health equity in higher education-results from a European pilot study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health equity is a critical concern in global health and a growing priority in higher education. This paper presents findings from a European pilot study conducted within the project of Health Equity Through Education for a Sustainable Future (HEQED), which aimed to explore and develop strategies for fostering students’ understanding of health equity and their capacity to act on this knowledge in professional contexts. The study involved 264 participants from four higher education institutions across Europe, who participated in a structured learning activity centred on real-world cases illustrating systemic health inequities. Using a post-activity survey and thematic analysis of open-ended responses, this study aims to examine students’ perceptions of the relevance, impact, and pedagogical value of the intervention. Responses indicated that students found the topic highly relevant and the learning experience both meaningful and transformative. The activity promoted critical reflection, empathy, and awareness of important aspect related to health equity, while also challenging students to consider their professional responsibilities in addressing inequities. The results were interpreted and understood in terms of the following three analytic themes; 1) confronting cases, 2) reflexive practise, and 3) professional development. In conclusion, educational triggers can promote reflection and competence in complex issues, such as health equity. For further understanding, long-term impacts should be explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.