Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41814298›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

"No data, no problem"? A critical reflection of health monitoring systems and equity during COVID-19 in Finland.

Laura Kihlström, Markku Satokangas, Natalia Skogberg, Marjaana Viita-Aho, Mika Gissler, Ilmo Keskimäki, Eeva Nykänen, Liina-Kaisa Tynkkynen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura KihlströmDepartment of Healthcare and Social Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, Helsinki, 00300, Finland. laura.kihlstrom@thl.fi.
Markku SatokangasDepartment of Healthcare and Social Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, Helsinki, 00300, Finland.
Natalia SkogbergDepartment of Healthcare and Social Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, Helsinki, 00300, Finland.
Marjaana Viita-AhoDepartment of Healthcare and Social Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, Helsinki, 00300, Finland.
Mika GisslerDepartment of Data and Analytics, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, Helsinki, 00300, Finland.
Ilmo KeskimäkiDepartment of Healthcare and Social Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, Helsinki, 00300, Finland.
Eeva NykänenDepartment of Healthcare and Social Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, Helsinki, 00300, Finland.
Liina-Kaisa TynkkynenDepartment of Healthcare and Social Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, Helsinki, 00300, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLessons drawn from the COVID-19 pandemic have highlighted that health monitoring systems in various countries did not adequately capture how the pandemic affected individuals and groups in vulnerable situations. Disaggregated data on different population groups were often not available nor utilized to target responses. Much less attention, however, has been paid on why this was the case and what implications this may have had for health equity in both COVID-19 responses and future health system preparedness. We draw on health systems and policy research as well as social epidemiology to focus on data governance, i.e. the decisions, reasons, and factors affecting how data are collected, utilized, analyzed and presented in health systems.

methodsThe article is written as a critical reflection in which we approach the Finnish response(s) to COVID-19 as a case study. We first describe the Finnish health monitoring system infrastructure prior to COVID-19, then present how data were utilized during the pandemic, and finally, demonstrate how data shaped responses, equity, as well as public perception of the crisis.

resultsThis critical reflection demonstrates how health monitoring systems, and particularly health system data, became both structural enablers and gatekeepers to equity during COVID-19 in Finland. A critical focus on data shows that the response in Finland during COVID-19 largely relied upon a homogenous perception of its population, reflected by the most commonly utilized data and indicators in national data dashboards. Disaggregated data for more tailored responses were eventually utilized, but only after the allocation of short-term additional resources.

conclusionsBased on our reflections regarding the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland, we argue that data have a critical role in framing health issues, garnering public attention for certain types of responses, and rendering certain population health issues visible or invisible. We discuss the implications of health monitoring and data practices in a single country context during COVID-19 for health system preparedness more generally. We conclude that equity-centered data and health monitoring practices should be viewed as a critical health system capacity.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health EquityFinlandHumansPandemic PreparednessPandemicsPublic Health InfrastructureSARS-CoV-2COVID-19DataHealth equityHealth monitoringHealth systems and policy research

Identifiers

PMID41814298
PMCPMC13088728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.