Trial reportBMC public health2026
Maintaining conceptual fidelity through teacher-led adaptation: an implementation-focused mixed methods study of a school-based physical activity program.
Trial report in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSchool-based physical activity programs are widely promoted to address adolescent physical inactivity, yet their population-level impact is often limited by implementation challenges in real-world school settings. While implementation fidelity is frequently assessed, less is known about how teachers actively balance adherence and local adaptation while maintaining core program principles. This study examined the implementation of the FIT FIRST Teen (FFTeen) program in Danish lower secondary schools, with a particular focus on how conceptual fidelity was enacted through teacher-led adaptations.
methodsAn implementation-focused mixed methods study was conducted in six intervention schools participating in a cluster randomized trial. Implementation fidelity was assessed through systematic observations of FFTeen sessions at three time points using a structured fidelity framework. Semi-structured interviews with teachers explored adoption, implementation experiences, adaptations, and perceived outcomes, guided by Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation theory. Data were analyzed using a deductive, framework-based approach integrating observational and interview data.
resultsFFTeen was implemented with moderate to high fidelity across schools, although procedural adherence varied substantially. Teachers frequently adapted session structure, activities, and organization in response to contextual constraints such as facilities, class composition, and scheduling. These adaptations generally preserved the program’s core principles of high intensity, inclusion, and enjoyment and were often associated with high student engagement. Teachers perceived FFTeen as offering clear pedagogical advantages over existing practices, particularly for engaging less-active students. However, sustained delivery of three weekly sessions was constrained by rigid timetables, competing curricular demands, and leadership support.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates how conceptual fidelity in school-based physical activity programs can be maintained through teacher-led adaptation rather than strict procedural adherence. Findings highlight the importance of flexible program design, professional judgement, and organizational alignment when implementing scalable physical activity interventions in schools. Rather than viewing adaptation as a threat to fidelity, implementation strategies should support teachers in enacting core principles within diverse and resource-constrained school contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.