ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Use of M-CHAT for autism screening in well-baby clinics of a primary health care center in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition in which early identification and intervention significantly improve developmental outcomes. The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F), is commonly used in primary care settings for early screening; however, real-world data on its performance in Saudi primary care, particularly within military healthcare systems, remain limited. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of ASD screening using M-CHAT-R/F among toddlers attending the Well-Baby Clinics (WBCs) at the Armed Forces Hospital in Dhahran, including the positive screening rate, reported ASD diagnoses, associated demographic factors, and monthly trends in screening yield.
methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the Family Medicine Department WBCs of the Armed Forces Hospital in Dhahran. All toddlers aged 16–30 months who underwent ASD screening between January 2024 and July 2025 were included. Demographic data and M-CHAT-R/F results were extracted from electronic medical records. Screening followed the standardized two-stage M-CHAT-R/F protocol, including the structured Follow-Up Interview for medium-risk initial scores. Screen-positive children were referred to pediatric specialists, and ASD diagnosis status was determined based on medical record documentation or caregiver report. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.0. Chi-square and independent t-tests were used to assess associations, with significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsA total of 742 toddlers were screened (51.9% females, 48.1% males), with a mean age of 19.3 ± 2.2 months. Forty-nine children screened positive on M-CHAT-R/F, yielding a screen-positive rate of 6.6%. Of these, 12 were identified as having received an ASD diagnosis following specialist evaluation, resulting in an ASD diagnosis rate of 1.6% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 24.5%. No significant associations were found between screening outcomes and sex (p = 0.145), age group (p = 0.551), or parental age (p > 0.05). Monthly screening positivity ranged from 0% to 14.6%, while ASD diagnosis rates following specialist evaluation ranged from 0% to 3.4%, with no consistent temporal trend.
conclusionsASD screening using M-CHAT-R/F in primary care WBCs demonstrated a low rate of ASD diagnosis following specialist evaluation with low-to-moderate PPV. Screening outcomes showed variability over time and were not significantly influenced by demographic factors. These findings highlight the importance of continued evaluation of referral pathways and follow-up processes to support early ASD detection in primary care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.