ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Get Social Media and Risk-Reduction Training (GET SMART) to improve infant safe sleep practices through a mobile text message-delivered video safe sleep intervention for new parents: study protocol for a type 3 hybrid implementation-effectiveness cluster randomized trial in 20 US birth hospitals.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06618586 (Get Social Media and Risk-Reduction Training), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Get Social Media and Risk-Reduction Training (GET SMART)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnnually, more than 3500 US infants die suddenly and unexpectedly. Many sudden unexpected infant deaths (SUID) are preventable with greater adherence to safe infant sleep guidelines. There are racial and socioeconomic disparities, both in adherence to these guidelines and in SUID rates. In the original Social Media and Risk-Reduction Training for Infant Care Practices (SMART) study in which 1600 mothers were randomized to receive short educational videos, focused on safe sleep vs. control, those receiving the safe sleep intervention had ~ 10% point higher rates of following safe sleep practices, with elimination of racial and socioeconomic disparities in safe sleep practices. GET SMART (Get Social Media and Risk-Reduction Training), a type 3 hybrid implementation-effectiveness cluster randomized trial, aims to determine optimal strategies to implement this safe sleep intervention in real-world conditions.
methodsWe have recruited 19 US birth hospitals in counties with high SUID rates. After a control phase, hospitals will complete, in a randomized, crossover design, both the “high touch” (HT) implementation strategy used in SMART (hospital staff introduced the program, obtained informed consent, and watched 2 videos with them) and a “low touch” (LT) strategy that uses a direct-to-consumer approach in which mothers use QR codes to sign up for the safe sleep video intervention. Implementation strategies and outcomes are grounded in the Proctor Conceptual Model of Implementation Research. We will compare the impact of the hospital-based HT and LT strategies with regards to differences in penetration (proportion of eligible mothers who sign up), equity of penetration according to income, race and ethnicity, and program cost per mother sign up. Effectiveness outcomes are adherence to 4 safe sleep practices (supine sleep position, sleep location [roomsharing without bedsharing], nonuse of soft bedding, pacifier use) after the 2-month intervention. DISCUSSION: Findings from this implementation-effectiveness study will inform strategies to broadly scale an easily replicated mobile-delivered video safe sleep intervention among groups with historically high rates of SUID.
trial registrationThis trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06618586), registration date 2024-08-27.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.