SynthesisBMC ophthalmology2026
Physical activity and the risk of cataract and age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Synthesis in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging Preclinical and Clinical Gaps in Ocular Therapeutics: Hydrogel Drug Delivery and 3D Tissue Models.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysical activity has been associated with a lower risk of cataract and age-related macular degeneration in some studies; however, the available evidence has not been fully consistent. We conducted a meta-analysis of cohort studies to clarify the association between physical activity and cataract and age-related macular degeneration.
methodsThe PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant prospective studies up to September 18, 2025. Random effects models were used to calculate summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between physical activity and the risk of cataract and age-related macular degeneration. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) criteria was used to evaluate the strength of evidence.
resultsA total of 10 cohort studies (8 publications) with 163,065 cases and 1,914,137 participants were included in the analysis of physical activity and cataract and 14 cohort studies (9 publications) with 17,653 cases and 566,895 participants were included in the analysis of age-related macular degeneration. The summary RR for high vs. low physical activity and cataract was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86–0.94, I2 = 74%, n = 10) and for age-related macular degeneration was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84–1.01, I2 = 60%, n = 14). The summary RR per 20 MET-hours/week increment in leisure-time physical activity was 0.91 (0.84–0.99, I2 = 66%, n = 3) for cataract and 0.92 (0.74–1.13, I2 = 48%, n = 3) for age-related macular degeneration, and there was no indication of nonlinear dose-response relationships (pnonlinearity=0.32 and pnonlinearity=0.34, respectively). There was no indication of publication bias. The evidence (judging the likelihood of causality) using WCRF criteria was judged as probable for cataract and limited-no conclusion for age-related macular degeneration.
conclusionThis meta-analysis provides further support for an inverse association between physical activity and risk of cataract, but an association with age-related macular degeneration was less evident. Any further studies should clarify the dose-response relationship and associations between different domains of physical activity in relation to these outcomes. These findings support public health recommendations to the general population to be physically active.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.