Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41814196›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2026

Genome-wide detection of selection signatures in roses.

Laurine Patzer, Frank Schaarschmidt, Marcus Linde, Thomas Debener

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laurine PatzerInstitute of Plant Genetics, Section Molecular Plant Breeding, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2512-9532
Frank SchaarschmidtInstitute of Cell Biology and Biophysics, Section Biostatistics, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6599-3803
Marcus LindeInstitute of Plant Genetics, Section Molecular Plant Breeding, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5877-600X
Thomas DebenerInstitute of Plant Genetics, Section Molecular Plant Breeding, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany. debener@genetik.uni-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2012-2246

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern roses are the result of extensive hybridization among wild species and cultivated forms, followed by strong artificial selection during the past two centuries. Understanding how such selection has shaped the rose genome can provide valuable insight into the genetic basis of key ornamental traits and guide future breeding strategies. To identify genomic regions affected by selection, we analyzed genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data across a diverse panel of cut and garden rose cultivars. Observed heterozygosity was calculated for sliding windows of 100 SNPs using 1,000 bootstrap replicates per group, complemented by analyses using physical window definitions. Regions showing significant local reductions in heterozygosity were considered putative selective sweeps. Gene models within these regions were functionally annotated using the Rosaceae Genome Database (Rosa chinensis genome v1.0), integrating Gene Ontology (GO) information. Genome-wide selection scans across the complete rose panel revealed 16 genomic regions exhibiting pronounced reductions in heterozygosity, indicating loci under strong selection during rose domestication. Several of these intervals colocalize with previously characterized genes, most notably RoKSN on chromosome 3, a central regulator of recurrent flowering, and RhPMP1 on chromosome 1, which encodes a plasma membrane protein involved in flower opening. When analyzed separately, cut and garden roses displayed distinct as well as overlapping selective signatures. Cut roses showed pronounced selection signals on chromosomes 3, 6 and 7, overlapping with loci previously associated with floral longevity, dehydration tolerance, and senescence regulation, including RhFer1, RhABF2 and RhNAC2. These associations suggest that the observed selective signals may relate to postharvest performance and stress resilience, although direct phenotypic data for our accessions are not available. Furthermore, a selective sweep region on chromosome 3 colocalized with RoTTG2, a gene associated with prickle density. The concordance with well-characterized loci demonstrates how past breeding has shaped major ornamental traits and points to additional sweep regions that could contain previously uncharacterized candidate genes.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantRosaSelection, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDiversityGenetic hitchhikingGenomic footprintsRosesSelection signaturesSelective sweepsSNPs

Identifiers

PMID41814196
PMCPMC13064398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.