ReviewBasic and clinical andrology2026
Zika virus and male reproductive health: essential updates for andrologists and fertility specialists.
Review in Basic and clinical andrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundZika virus (ZIKV), a mosquito-borne flavivirus, remains a concern for reproductive health despite the waning of the 2015-2016 epidemic. Unique among arboviruses, ZIKV can be sexually transmitted, with viral RNA persisting in semen beyond the acute phase, posing potential risks to male fertility and assisted reproduction. This narrative review provides clinicians with a contemporary understanding of ZIKV epidemiology, virology, and its implications for male reproductive care.
resultsZIKV transmission has stabilised into low-level endemicity in Central and South America, with Europe reporting sporadic travel-associated cases. Persistence in semen is underpinned by infection of immune-privileged testicular tissues, including Sertoli, Leydig, and germ cells, enabling RNA detection for months post-infection even after systemic symptoms resolve. While replication-competent virus is rarely isolated beyond 4-6 weeks, viral RNA has been detected in semen over 180 days in rare cases. Clinically, ZIKV infection is associated with transient declines in sperm count, motility, and increased DNA fragmentation, likely mediated by inflammation, blood-testis barrier disruption, and impaired testosterone biosynthesis. Human studies suggest recovery of semen quality in most cases, but animal models demonstrate more persistent testicular damage and subfertility, supporting potential long-term reproductive impact. Current WHO guidance recommends a 3-month deferral from conception for men with confirmed or suspected ZIKV exposure. In assisted reproduction, cryopreserved semen from recently exposed individuals may retain viral RNA, requiring stringent handling and closed-system storage. Routine semen PCR testing is not widely adopted due to sensitivity limitations and inability to distinguish infectivity; thus, risk stratification based on travel and exposure history remains central to decision-making. In clinical practice, this risk stratification typically applies to men undergoing fertility assessment with recent travel to ZIKV-endemic regions, particularly in Central or South America, with compatible symptom history or recent onset infertility.
conclusionsZIKV remains a relevant consideration in andrology and fertility practice, particularly in regions with ongoing endemic transmission and in individuals with travel-related exposure. Awareness of its virological properties, reproductive implications, and guidance for pre-conception counselling, laboratory practice, and semen storage is crucial. With appropriate precautions and patient education, most couples can safely proceed with fertility planning following ZIKV exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.