Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41814161›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2026

Transcriptomic analysis of three annelid species: looking for markers of positional information.

Sofia E Platova, Liudmila O Poliushkevich, Zinaida I Starunova, Viktor V Starunov, Elena L Novikova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sofia E Platova *Laboratory of Metagenomic Research, Saint-Petersburg Pasteur Institute, 14 Mira St, St. Petersburg, 197101, Russia.
Liudmila O Poliushkevich *Department of Embryology, St Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya Emb, 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia.
Zinaida I StarunovaLaboratory of Evolutionary Morphology, Zoological institute RAS, 1 Universitetskaya Emb., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia.
Viktor V StarunovLaboratory of Evolutionary Morphology, Zoological institute RAS, 1 Universitetskaya Emb., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia.
Elena L NovikovaDepartment of Embryology, St Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya Emb, 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia. e.nowikowa@spbu.ru.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 21-14-00304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPositional information, classically defined through morphogen gradients, underlies the establishment and maintenance of spatial coordinates in developing organisms and remains essential throughout post-embryonic growth and regeneration. Many conserved developmental regulators, including components of the Wnt, FGF, retinoid, caudal, Hox, and ParaHox pathways, continue to function after embryogenesis, supporting posterior growth, segmentation, stem cell activity, and regenerative responses. Studies across metazoans demonstrate that gradients of these factors are maintained in adult tissues and are reorganized after injury, thereby guiding correct pattern restoration. Annelids provide a powerful model for investigating post-embryonic patterning and the maintenance of positional information. They grow by adding segments from a posterior growth zone, exhibit dynamic shifts in segment position throughout life, and show diverse regenerative capacities, offering an opportunity to identify molecular correlates of these differences.

resultsWe generated spatially resolved transcriptomes for three annelid species with distinct regenerative potentials – Pygospio elegans, Platynereis dumerilii, and Arenicola marina. By analyzing differential gene expression across body fragments, we reconstructed expression patterns along the anterior-posterior axis and examined genes involved in organogenesis, growth zone function, and potential positional information.

conclusionThis comparative transcriptomic study shows that spatial gene expression in three annelid species broadly corresponds to major anatomical territories but also reflects deeper developmental origins. The clear transcriptional differences between larval and postlarval segments in P. elegans and P. dumerilii suggest that segment ontogeny, not anatomy alone, contributes to regional molecular identity. The posterior growth zones of these two species exhibit strong activation of Wnt, cad, Hox, and GMP genes, consistent with an active stem-cell–based growth program. In contrast, the posterior region of A. marina lacks these signatures, supporting previous evidence for an inactive growth zone and the absence of posterior regeneration. Gradient-like expression of Hox, ParaHox, and Wnt genes in P. elegans and P. dumerilii indicates that these factors may encode positional information along the body axis and facilitate regeneration. Their truncated expression in A. marina likely reflects functional specialization of the adult body. Overall, our findings highlight conserved molecular systems involved in posterior growth and positional identity, while revealing species-specific modifications associated with reduced regenerative capacity.

Indexed as

AnnelidaGene Expression ProfilingPolychaetaTranscriptomeAnimalsBody PatterningGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalRegenerationAnnelidsArenicolaPlatynereisPositional informationPygospioRNAseq

Identifiers

PMID41814161
PMCPMC13094222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.