ArticleBMC genomics2026
The genetic repertoire underlying electrogenic sulphur oxidation in cable bacteria.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distribution of a novel DsrEFH sulfur transferase suggests widespread sulfur oxidation capacity in sulfate reducers.The ISME journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCable bacteria are filamentous, sulphur-oxidizing microorganisms of the Desulfobulbaceae family that conduct electrons over centimetre-scale distances, coupling sulphide oxidation in deeper sediments to oxygen reduction near the surface. Geochemical evidence demonstrates high rates of aerobic sulphide oxidation in sediments inhabited by cable bacteria. Still, the underlying physiological and molecular basis of this electrogenic sulphur metabolism remains unresolved. Previous genomic analysis proposed that cable bacteria oxidize sulphide by reversing the canonical dissimilatory sulphite reduction (Dsr) pathway.
resultsWe evaluated the sulphur metabolism of cable bacteria and related Desulfobulbales through comparative genomics, using an expanded set of 31 quality-filtered cable bacteria genomes, including 7 closed assemblies. We showed that cable bacteria encode a complete Dsr pathway, including the previously missing dsrD and dsrT genes, as well as a novel gene cluster with DsrOP homologues. All Dsr genes were classified as reductive-type, and phylogenetic analyses indicated a close affiliation with those of other Desulfobulbaceae (sulphate-reducing and/or sulphur-disproportionating bacteria). In addition, several other previously unrecognized sulphur-metabolism genes were identified in both cable bacteria and closely related Desulfobulbales, including a novel subtype of sulphide:quinone oxidoreductase (SQR), a putative rhodanese–persulphide dioxygenase fusion (Rho–PDO), and a YTD gene cluster (consisting of five genes) previously proposed to be characteristic of sulphur-disproportionation lineages. Structural predictions indicate that three uncharacterized YTD-encoded proteins assemble into a DsrEFH-like double heterotrimer, albeit with highly divergent, non-orthologous sequences. Finally, we integrated publicly available transcriptomic and proteomic data to confirm the in vivo expression of these genes, with expression patterns mirroring those of Desulfolithobacter dissulfuricans and Desulfurivibrio alkaliphilus.
conclusionCable bacteria show minimal genetic divergence and little differential expression in their sulphur-metabolism genes compared to related organisms. Together, our findings challenge the idea that sulphide oxidation occurs via a reversed Dsr pathway. We propose a unique sulphur metabolism model for cable bacteria, in which a canonical reductive/disproportionating sulphur-metabolism repertoire (similar to Desulfolithobacter dissulfuricans and Desulfurivibrio alkaliphilus) is coupled to net sulphide oxidation through long-distance electron transport. Key steps include sulphide oxidation to polysulphide by SQR, putative conversion to sulphite via Rho–PDO and/or proteins encoded in the YTD cluster, and subsequent disproportionation through the Dsr pathway, where sulphide re-enters the cycle. Net sulphide oxidation and sulphate production arise because electrons are efficiently drained via long-distance electron transport, effectively coupling the metabolism to oxygen reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.