Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41814101›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of sociology2026

Beyond Distinction: Private Art Museums and Their Versatile Role for Elites' (Self)Legitimization Discourses.

Sara de Andrade Silva, Kristina Kolbe, Olav Velthuis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara de Andrade SilvaUniversity of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1945-6441
Kristina KolbeSociology of Arts and Culture, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1254-3024
Olav VelthuisDepartment Chair/Sociology of Economic Life & Culture, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 406.18.CW.012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2000s have witnessed a significant, worldwide boom in new art museums founded by private, wealthy collectors. While the arts have long been a key arena for the remaking of elite distinction and the reproduction of inequalities, this surge in private museums has sparked much controversy. In this paper, we demonstrate how wealthy elites deploy this form of cultural philanthropy for (self)legitimation. Based on topic modelling analysis, we examine the online mission statements and 'about us' sections of 399 private museums across 59 countries to understand what forms of legitimation discourses they construct. We find that, beyond discourses of intra-elite distinction, the mission statements additionally mobilize discursive legitimation strategies that highlight private museums and their founders as reliable, institutionalized agents in the artworld and valuable philanthropic actors in society more broadly. Overall, our analysis demonstrates how the arts function as a particularly versatile and powerful tool for symbolic elite legitimation struggles, allowing wealthy elites from different backgrounds to coalesce globally around private art museums. In light of escalating wealth concentration and widening economic disparities around the world, our paper adds to sociology's critical imperative to scrutinize the formation and reproduction of contemporary elites.

Indexed as

ArtMuseumsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41814101
PMCPMC13536527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.