Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41814086›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Detrimental effect of metal contaminants on forensic DNA analysis and strategies for mitigation.

Safiyah Tehsin, Hirak Ranjan Dash

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Safiyah TehsinSchool of Forensic Sciences, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Bhubaneswar, 752050, Odisha, India.
Hirak Ranjan DashSchool of Forensic Sciences, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Bhubaneswar, 752050, Odisha, India. hirakdash@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1954-6452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal contamination in biological samples poses a significant challenge in forensic DNA workflows, leading to low DNA yield, degradation of DNA, overestimation of DNA quantity, generation of a partial profile, or a null profile. Metals like Fe and Ca are inherent components of various biological samples, including blood, bone, teeth and muscles. Metals are also accumulated in the biological samples either from environmental exposure or from occupational hazards. Metal surgical implants, substance use disorder, tattoo inks, cosmetic products, and low-cost jewellery can also contribute to metal contaminants in the biological samples. Samples collected from metallic surfaces and/or the use of metallic collection devices interact with each other to leach metals into the samples. The current review focuses on the various sources of metal contamination in forensic biological samples, their detrimental effect on DNA damage, and steps of forensic DNA profiling such as extraction, quantification, amplification, and capillary electrophoresis. Metal ions inhibit DNA polymerase by competitive binding with Mg2+, fluorescence quenching during quantification, and modification of electroosmotic flow during separation. New generation multiplex kits have been developed for forensic applications. Such kits use high-fidelity DNA polymerase and an appropriate buffering system to overcome the problems associated with metal contaminants. However, proper attribution of the metal contaminant and selection of a suitable strategy to demineralize the samples, either by using a chelating agent or size exclusion chromatography, along with the new generation multiplex kit, might significantly improve the quality of a DNA profile.

Indexed as

DNADNA ContaminationDNA FingerprintingMetalsDNA DamageHumansDNAMetalsForensic DNA analysisMetal contaminationMetal-DNA interactionPCR facilitatorPCR inhibitionPolymerase inhibition

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.