ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
CONReg: Uncertainty-Aware Medical Image Registration Using Conformal Prediction.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) has advanced medical image registration, but most models produce only point estimates of dense displacement fields (DDFs) without providing information on model uncertainty, which limits clinical reliability. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) addresses this gap by identifying regions and cases where predictions may be less trustworthy. We present CONReg, a framework that integrates quantile regression with conformal prediction (CP) to provide voxelwise and case-level UQ in registration. A 3D U-Net was trained on publicly available brain and lung datasets to predict DDFs along with lower and upper quantile bounds, yielding predictive intervals for voxel displacements. Uncertainty was also estimated at anatomically defined keypoints (KPs), and CP calibrated these intervals to produce 95% statistically valid confidence bounds, represented as uncertainty bounding boxes (UBBxs). Clustering based on UBBx volumes stratified both KPs and entire cases into certain and uncertain groups. Across all test datasets, the achieved empirical coverage ranged from 0.92 to 0.98, indicating reliable UQ. Certain KPs and cases consistently exhibited significantly lower target registration error than uncertain ones (p < 0.05). For brain datasets, a pretrained VoxelMorph model was also applied to subgroup cases, and mean squared error (MSE) comparisons showed significantly lower MSE in certain cases (p < 0.05). These findings demonstrate that CONReg provides a statistically principled approach to registration uncertainty, improving both the reliability and interpretability of DL-based medical image registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41814074What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.