Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41814062›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Cost-effective, open-source, automated apparatus for testing transitive inference in mice.

Silvia Margarian, Yihan Chen, Jumana Waheed, Parham Rezaeimanesh, Vic Shao-Chih Chiang, Kaori Takehara-Nishiuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Silvia MargarianDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall Room 4007, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canada.
Yihan ChenHuman Biology Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jumana WaheedDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall Room 4007, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canada.
Parham RezaeimaneshHuman Biology Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Vic Shao-Chih ChiangDepartment of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA.
Kaori Takehara-NishiuchiDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, Sidney Smith Hall Room 4007, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canada. kaori.nishiuchi@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transitive inference is a form of reasoning that relies on prior knowledge and benefits survival in diverse species. While initially designed for humans, the transitive inference task has been adapted for mice, allowing for integration with various state-of-the-art manipulation and monitoring tools for mechanistic investigations. Existing paradigms, however, rely on manually presented stimuli, making them time-consuming, labor-intensive, and error-prone. Here, we introduce AutoTI, a fully automated behavioral apparatus that precisely controls the timing of task events and logs timestamps for events and responses. The automation also enables continuous, undisturbed monitoring of spontaneous behavior, allowing for detailed analyses of movement trajectory beyond basic accuracy metrics. Using AutoTI, we developed a robust training protocol that reliably achieved high success rates on transitive tests in mice. Notably, mice exhibited hallmark behavioral patterns seen in humans, including the symbolic distance effect and the serial position effect. AutoTI provides a cost-effective and scalable system for investigating the neurobiological basis of inferential reasoning. It also holds promise for translational research targeting its impairment in autism, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer’s disease, as well as advancing the reasoning capabilities of artificial intelligence.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceAutomationCost-Benefit AnalysisIntelligent SystemsMaleMiceCognitive mapDecision makingMiceReasoningRelational memorySchema

Identifiers

PMID41814062
PMCPMC13100038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.