ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
The utility of pelvic lymph node dissection in PSMA-PET negative intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From reflex to reason: rethinking pelvic lymph node dissection in the PSMA PET Era.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare perioperative and early oncological outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy (RP) with and without extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in a cohort of intermediate (IR)-to-high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients.
methodsData was prospectively collected from 88 patients (47 PLND, 41 no-PLND) with unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk miN0M0 PCa, all staged preoperatively with PSMA-PET/CT. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, uni-and multivariable Cox regression, for biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) and biochemical failure-free survival (BCFFS). A propensity score matched analysis with Cox regression was undertaken matching 1:1 for potential confounders (age, iPSA, preoperative ISUP, cT stage at MRI).
resultsBoth groups (PLND and no-PLND) had the same proportion of HR patients (p = 1.0). The no-PLND group had a shorter median operative time by 50 min (p < 0.01). Conversely, the PLND group experienced significantly higher rates of 90-day high-grade complications (p = 0.03) and lymphoceles (p < 0.01). Over a median 20.5-month follow-up, no significant differences emerged in BCRFS (p = 0.59) or BCFFS (p = 0.76). Uni- and multivariable analyses adjusted for UCSF CAPRA and CAPRA-S variables, as well as propensity score matching, confirmed PLND was not associated with improved BCFFS. In patients who did recur, the sites of recurrence did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.62), with pelvic nodal recurrence being the most common site of recurrence in both groups (6, 50% for PLND and 3, 60% for no-PLND).
conclusionsIn this short-term follow-up, performing PLND increased high-grade postoperative complications without providing a clear early oncological benefit regarding BCRFS, PSA persistence, or recurrence location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.