ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Autologous Fascial Grafting for Alar Base Depression: A Novel Technique in Asian Rhinoplasty.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNasal base depression is a frequent aesthetic concern in rhinoplasty, particularly in patients with midfacial retrusion. This study introduces a fascia transplantation technique to correct alar base (paranasal) depression and restore nasal-facial harmony through structural support of the alar base.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 52 patients who underwent fascia grafting during open rhinoplasty. Fascia placement was performed primarily for alar base/paranasal augmentation; changes in tip projection or nasolabial angle, when present, were not direct surgical targets of the fascia graft. Fascia was harvested from postauricular or rectus abdominis regions, depending on the cartilage source. Nasal morphology was evaluated pre- and postoperatively using standardized anthropometric measurements. Alar base depression was quantitatively assessed through grayscale image analysis using ImageJ. Patient satisfaction was measured with a modified Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) scale. Complications were monitored via clinical examination, standardized photography, and a structured questionnaire addressing symptoms such as foreign-body sensation, graft displacement, and local discomfort.
resultsFollowing fascia-based nasal base augmentation, significant aesthetic improvements were observed. Alar width and base width changes were minimal and statistically insignificant. Postoperative grayscale analysis showed a significant decrease in values (from 0.720 to 0.583, P < 0.05), indicating reduced alar base depression following fascia grafting. The mean postoperative ROE score increased notably, with no major complications such as foreign-body sensation or graft displacement reported.
conclusionFascia transplantation provides stable augmentation of the alar base/paranasal region with a favorable safety profile; any observed changes in tip projection or nasolabial angle should be interpreted as secondary (indirect) effects rather than direct targets of fascia placement. It represents a safe and effective autologous option for achieving durable, harmonious aesthetic outcomes in rhinoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41813990What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.