ArticleNature2026
Immune evasive DNA donors and recombinases license kilobase-scale writing.
Article in Nature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gene editing using large insertions.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Large serine recombinase-mediated gene insertion for high-throughput screens: advantages, design principles, and applications.Nucleic acids research · 2026Review
- Programmable enzymes for targeted gene insertion.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Article
- Donor-complementary prime editing enables precise kilobase and library-compatible DNA insertions.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Flying under the radar: immune-evasive DNA for genome engineering.Cell research · 2026Article
- Immune-evasive DNA integration with INSTALL.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Article
- A retargeted recombinase for precise insertion of large DNA.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Ultra-large targeted DNA integrations in primary human cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-editing technologies that use recombinases to insert kilobase-scale DNA sequences into mammalian genomes canonically require large double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) donors
Indexed as
Identifiers
41813887What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.