Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41813877›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Systematic performance evaluation and application validation of an end-to-end NGS workstation.

Wenlong Xie, Chen Yang, Shibo Ren

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenlong XieNanodigmbio (Nanjing) Biotechnology Co.Ltd., Floor 5-6, Tower 11, 71 XingHui Road, Jiangbei New District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Chen YangNanodigmbio (Nanjing) Biotechnology Co.Ltd., Floor 5-6, Tower 11, 71 XingHui Road, Jiangbei New District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. yangchen@nanodigmbio.com.
Shibo RenNanjing Institute of Metrological Supervision and Testing, No. 10, Maqun Avenue, Qixia District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. 450997180@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) library preparation is a core component of precision genomics, but it is commonly constrained by inefficiency, variability, and low throughput of manual protocols. To address these limitations, we developed and systematically evaluated a fully automated NGS workstations and further validated its performance across representative application scenarios. The automated system reduced total processing time from 8 to 10 to 4–6 h. At the same time, it maintained similar performance in pre-library metric, including DNA yield and fragment size, as well as post-capture sequencing metrics (Q30 > 90%, mapping rates > 95%, on-target rates 85–90%). The duplication rate was reduced to 5–8%, compared with 10–15% for manual methods, indicating increased library complexity. Bioinformatic evaluation of inter-species read mapping showed minimal cross-contamination, with a maximum contamination ratio of 0.0003%, indicating effective sample isolation in the automated workflow. High concordance in variant detection was observed between automated and manual workflows. Overall, this automated workstation provides a standardized and reproducible workflow that supports scalable precision genomics applications.

Indexed as

GenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAComputational BiologyGene LibraryReproducibility of ResultsWorkflowAutomated workstationCross-contaminationHybridization captureLibrary preparationNext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41813877
PMCPMC13100069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.