ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhanced skin cancer classification for minority classes using Conditional GAN pipeline and CNN-ViT ensemble.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although Deep learning (DL) methodologies have progressed substantially, the classification of skin cancer remains a challenging task. There are several reasons for this. Some of them are: artifacts like Hair; severe class imbalance in dermatoscopic datasets; and difficulty in extracting both fine-grained local features (details within small area of lesion) like texture, color, pigment network, vascular patterns and long range global features like overall shape, border irregularity, asymmetry. To overcome these, this study presents a novel, two-stage framework. At first, C’GAN (Conditional Generative Adversarial Network) is employed for generation of duplicate images for the minority classes. Then secondly, a CNN-ViT ensemble architecture is introduced followed by a cross attention based fusion module to fuse their features. The attention fusion model synergistically merges ViT’s global token representations with CNN’s local feature maps. The overall performance is analyzed through some standard quantitative metrics, whereas the reliability as well as the stability are validated through bootstrap based statistical analysis. The framework achieved remarkable accuracies of 99.3%, 99.7%, 98.9% and 98.2% on Dermatofibroma, Vascular lesions, Basal Cell Carcinoma, and Actinic Keratosis respectively, besides 99.4% overall AUC, 0.93 bootstrap mean, and 0.0003 standard error. The proposed model showed balanced performance both on majority as well as on minority classes, showcasing it’s effectiveness in class imbalance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.