ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Using clinical simulation to evaluate a video telehealth consultation summary application.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients forget up to 80% of information conveyed during medical consultations. While clinicians may provide hand-written notes to patients during in-person appointments, such opportunities are limited in telehealth. Palliative care patients with complex information needs may benefit from consultation summaries. We developed a consultation summary application (CSA) to generate patient-facing summaries during video telehealth, in a palliative care context. Traditional research methods fall short in early identification and resolution of socio-technical factors, e.g., workflow compatibility, which impact the adoption of digital health innovations. Drawing on the Service Readiness Level Framework, we adopted a phased approach to generating evidence for the CSA. We conducted clinical simulations with seven clinician-simulated patient dyads involving the metastatic lung cancer scenario to examine and address usability and workflow integration issues prior to real-world implementation. Both clinicians and simulated patients perceived the CSA as a valuable tool to support palliative care patients with information recall and self-management. We recommend clinical simulation to de-risk real-world deployment, and optimise the digital health innovations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.