Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41813850›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Reception of conspecific cues alters testicular gene expression and improves fertility in boreal chorus frogs (Pseudacris maculata).

Jeffrey P Ethier, Hyojin Lee, Stacey A Robinson, Vance L Trudeau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeffrey P EthierDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. jethi009@uottawa.ca.
Hyojin LeeDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Stacey A RobinsonEcotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, Wildlife and Landscape Science Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Burlington, ON, Canada.
Vance L TrudeauDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence for the social modulation of reproduction in vertebrates is established but poorly defined for many taxa despite the link between social cues and endocrine function. It is unclear if physiological effects, such as increased sex hormone concentration or gamete maturation, impact reproductive outcomes, such as fertilization rates or viability of offspring. We investigated the effect of conspecific signals on the calling behaviour, reproductive output, and gonadal gene expression in the boreal chorus frogs (Pseudacris maculata). Using breeding trials in a captive setting, we found that broadcasts of conspecific calls nearly doubled the duration of calling activity and increased the proportion of viable eggs by over 13%. We then used RNA-sequencing techniques to demonstrate exposure to broadcasts of chorus behaviour increased the expression of genes associated with steroidogenesis, spermatogenesis, and gonadal development in the male chorus frogs within 6 h. Several gene pathways were similarly affected in the male chorus frogs receiving hormone injections to induce sperm development and release, implying there are parallels in hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis stimulation induced by reception of conspecific cues and hormonal induction. We provide some of the first evidence of amphibian social signals causing rapid molecular changes linked to fertility regulation.

Indexed as

AnuraCuesFertilityTestisAnimalsFemaleGene Expression RegulationMaleReproductionSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimal behaviourGene expressionReproductionRNA-sequencingSocial modulation

Identifiers

PMID41813850
PMCPMC13099952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.