ArticleScientific reports2026
Facilitating the spread prediction of public health emergencies based on spatio-temporal neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To overcome the shortcomings of traditional models in capturing the spatiotemporal dynamics of epidemic spread, this study introduces an innovative model, hybrid spatio-temporal neural network architecture (MI-GCN-LSTM), which integrates mutual information (MI), long short term memory (LSTM), and graph convolutional network (GCN) to collaboratively predict epidemic trends across multiple regions during public health emergencies. First, an adjacency matrix is constructed using mutual information theory to quantify the influence of complex behaviors such as interregional population movement, thus capturing potential spatial dependencies more accurately. Second, GCN are applied to identify transmission patterns across regions and extract spatial features. Ultimately, LSTM are employed to model long-term temporal dependencies and dynamic trends in the development of epidemics. To evaluate the model's effectiveness, a case study uses COVID-19 data from several European countries provided by the World Health Organization (WHO), as well as city-level data from Hubei Province released by its Health Commission. Results show that the proposed model achieves superior performance compared to the suboptimal LSTM-GCN model on datasets from several European countries, reducing MAE and RMSE by 9.22% and 4.24%, respectively. On the Hubei dataset, the improvements are more substantial, MAE decreased by approximately 27.74%. This study provides decision making support for emergency response and lays the foundation for future forecasting and resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.