Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41813830›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2026

Securitization as a means to pay for cell and gene therapies for orphan diseases: a simulation study.

John M Lu, Avi J Cherla, Alexander W Carter, Elias A Mossialos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John M LuLSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3972-8854
Avi J CherlaLSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics, London, UK.
Alexander W CarterLSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics, London, UK.
Elias A MossialosLSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics, London, UK. e.a.mossialos@lse.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8664-9297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell and gene therapies may provide life-extending treatments for patients. However, paying for these therapies using a single upfront payment will be challenging because of uncertainty about long-term clinical effectiveness and affordability. Developers, recognizing the challenges of paying for these therapies, have offered payers 5-year outcomes-based installment plans. The short length of these plans, however, does little to address uncertainties about the cost-effectiveness of paying for these therapies. Instead, we propose to offer 30-year performance-based annuities that shift payments to match the expected accrual of clinical benefits more closely. Using securitization techniques combined with long-term performance-based annuities, we demonstrate that in the case of the gene therapy Zolgensma, this mechanism is effective at mitigating concerns over value and affordability for payers. In summary, our proposal for financing cell and gene therapies creates a viable incentive for developers, while also balancing long-term effectiveness and budget impact concerns from payers and access challenges for patients.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyGenetic TherapyRare DiseasesComputer SimulationCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisGene Therapy AgentsHumans

Identifiers

PMID41813830
PMCPMC13056534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.