ArticleScientific reports2026
EffectorFisher: association of disease phenotype with pangenomic protein-isoform profiles for improved prediction of fungal pathogenicity effectors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant-pathogenic fungi cause crop disease via a range of secreted effector proteins that interact with specific receptors of host plant cells. Effector identification can enable the diagnosis of disease outcomes and enable selection or breeding of disease-resistant crop cultivars. Bioinformatic methods have been developed to predict proteins with 'effector-like' properties, but the resulting number of candidates tends to be larger than can be feasibly validated and may contain numerous false positives. Challenges to effector discovery include the obfuscating effects of genome-wide mutations common to Fungi, such as Repeat-Induced Point (RIP) mutations. Refining effector predictions by incorporating disease phenotyping into genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have had mixed success for a handful of pathogen species. But the utility of GWAS approaches may be limited by low 'signal-to-noise' caused by widespread RIP-like SNP mutations across the genomes of most fungal pathogens. This study presents an alternative method for effector candidate refinement called 'EffectorFisher'. EffectorFisher extends the output of Predector - a tool that automates and combines results of several bioinformatic tools commonly used in effector discovery - to apply pangenome-derived protein-isoform profiling to remove candidate effector protein isoforms with weak association with virulent phenotypes. This method was benchmarked using corresponding pangenome and phenotype data for two model wheat pathogens, each with multiple known effectors: the necrotroph Parastagonospora nodorum and the hemibiotroph Zymoseptoria tritici. Compared to prior methods based on effector-like protein properties, EffectorFisher improved predicted rankings of known effectors and reduced the total number of effector candidates. We present EffectorFisher ( https://github.com/ccdmb/EffectorFisher-core ) as a useful tool for refining effector predictions with phenotype data, which is broadly applicable to many fungal pathogen species, and is capable of predicting effectors involved in both gene-for-gene and inverse gene-for-gene effector-receptor interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.