ArticleScientific reports2026
USG-guided unilateral retrolaminar block decreases pain and enhances patient comfort during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy, opioid consumption, patient-operator satisfaction, and hemodynamic changes of ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block (RLB) in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). A total of 60 patients who underwent ESWL were divided into two groups: the RLB group (patients who received RLB 30 min before the procedure, n = 30) and the control group (patients who did not receive any block, n = 30). The primary outcome measure was the assessment of analgesic efficacy using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcome measures were opioid consumption, hemodynamic variables (heart rate and mean arterial pressure), patient-operator satisfaction scores, stone-free rate, and discharge time. VAS scores were significantly lower in the RLB group (p < 0.001). Mean tramadol consumption in the control group was found to be 19.33 ± 16.64 mg, which was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.001). Patient and operator satisfaction was significantly higher in the RLB group (p < 0.001), hemodynamic stability was maintained throughout the procedure, and no block-related complications were observed. RLB provided effective analgesia and significantly reduced opioid requirements in ESWL patients. Balanced hemodynamic stability was achieved throughout the procedure, maximizing patient and operator satisfaction. Therefore, RLB is a fascial plane block that provides effective analgesia that can be applied for outpatient urological procedures such as ESWL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.