ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-scale experimental and computational assessment of heat transfer behavior in compact short fin structures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study presents a comparative analysis of temperature distribution and heat transfer performance of short fins using experimental, simulation and theoretical method. An experimental setup was developed to investigate square, circular, rectangular, trapezoidal, and triangular fins under a constant heat input of 30 W, with specimen lengths of 0–80 mm, temperatures of 77–50 °C, and natural convection conditions (ambient air at 25 °C, velocity 0.2 to 0.5 m/s). Results show that square fins achieved the highest heat transfer rate (5.32 W), efficiency (94.86%), and effectiveness (23.77), while cylindrical fins performed slightly lower. Among materials, mild steel with a rectangular cross-section demonstrated superior thermal performance, with a heat transfer rate of 5.42 W and fin effectiveness of 25.89. Thermal resistances for mild steel, stainless steel, cast iron, and titanium were 10.61, 32.55, 18.21, and 42.83 °C/W, respectively. The study reveals how short-fin geometry and material influence heat transfer, airflow, and turbulence under natural convection. The findings are scalable, providing guidance for designing heat sinks and cooling systems. By integrating experiments and simulations, the research identifies optimal fin configurations and uncovers localized thermal and flow behaviors, offering practical strategies for improved thermal management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.