ArticleScientific reports2026
Soil stoichiometric characteristics of protected cultivation systems in Northwest China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil ecological stoichiometry is essential for understanding nutrient cycling and ecosystem functioning in agricultural systems. However, how planting duration and crop type affect soil stoichiometric characteristics in protected cultivation systems across different agroecological zones remains unclear. Therefore, we selected 189 protected cultivation systems (PCS) and 130 adjacent open-field systems (OFS) in southern Shaanxi (SS), central Shaanxi (CS), and northern Shaanxi (NS) of Northwest China. The topsoil (0–20 cm) samples were collected in common cultivation durations (short-term cultivation, ST; medium-term cultivation, MT; long-term cultivation, LT) and crop types (leafy vegetables, LV; solanaceous vegetables, SV; fresh fruits, FF) plots to measure soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), and other soil properties. The average ratios of C: N, C: P, and N: P for OFS were 14.37, 11.86, and 0.93, which were significantly different from 7.71 (C: N), 33.35 (C: P), and 4.38 (N: P) for PCS (P < 0.01). The key soil stoichiometric ratios (C: P, N: P, C: K, N: K) in both PCS and OFS were strongly modulated by agroecological zone, following a gradient of SS > CS > NS, while the soil C: N ratio in PCS ranged from 2.69 to 16.17. Cultivation duration significantly affected soil stoichiometric ratios of PCS, and its effects varied among agroecological zones. In NS, the C: K, N: P, N: K and P: K ratios of PCS under LT were 1.80, 1.56, 1.98 and 2.02 times those under ST, respectively. Crop type alone had limited effects except for N: K, but its interactions with agroecological zone and cultivation duration significantly affected C: N, C: K, N: K, and P: K. Partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) indicated that soil stoichiometric ratios were influenced by agroecological zone, cultivation duration, and crop type through both direct pathways and indirect pathways mediated by soil properties. Furthermore, soil properties exerted stronger effects on soil stoichiometric ratios than agroecological zone or management factors. Therefore, this context dependence complicates attempts to generalize stoichiometric relationships but also highlights potential management strategies (e.g., K fertilization) for regulating soil nutrient balances across agroecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.