ArticleScientific reports2026
A BP neural network model for intelligent quality monitoring of industry-education integration and talent cultivation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To achieve process-oriented and quantitative quality monitoring of the effectiveness of industry-education integration in universities, this study proposes a quality evaluation method based on the Back Propagation neural network (BPNN). The method conducts predictive modeling and performance verification for different types of university-enterprise cooperation projects in universities. Based on the Input-Process-Output (IPO) evaluation framework, this study constructs a multi-dimensional indicator system and develops an enhanced Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) model to improve its robustness and adaptability in heterogeneous educational data. The results show that the constructed BPNN achieves a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0114 and a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.947 on the validation set. Compared with the LR model, its R² is improved by 41.2%, ranking the best-performing model among all comparative models. Moreover, it maintains stable predictive performance with R² > 0.93 across eight professional subsets. The research indicates that the BPNN can effectively capture the complex relationships among multi-dimensional educational indicators and is suitable for quality evaluation tasks of industry-education integration in multiple scenarios of universities. This approach provides a robust, intelligent tool for enhancing the dynamic management and continuous improvement of industry-education integration initiatives in higher education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.