Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41813758›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Smart technologies for enhancing greenhouse production management under climate and economic challenges.

Ali Akbar Barati, Mohammadali Zandi Nezami, Hossein Shabanali Fami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali Akbar BaratiDepartment of Agricultural Management and Development, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. aabarati@ut.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0375-2331
Mohammadali Zandi NezamiDepartment of Agricultural Management and Development, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein Shabanali FamiDepartment of Agricultural Management and Development, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increase in climate fluctuations and their effects has led farmers to favor controlled environments, including greenhouses. However, neglecting good management practices can not only result in the waste of production resources but also increase production costs and their negative impacts. Using smart technologies can accelerate good greenhouse management practices (GGMP). The main objective of the present study was to examine how the use of smart technologies affects GGMP, with emphasis on climatic and economic factors. A composite index (GGMP Index) was developed to evaluate GGMP, and path analysis was used for data analysis. The sample consisted of 141 agricultural greenhouse units. Based on the findings of this study, the GGMP index dropped from 7.2 to 4.5 (out of 10) from the pre-production to the post-production stages. The study revealed that currently, only about 30% of greenhouses have a satisfactory level of good management. This is concerning, as using smart technologies can optimize agricultural operations for food production in greenhouses and highlights the impact of variables such as climatic and economic conditions, regulations and standards, and the technical characteristics of greenhouses, especially in regions with harsh or unpredictable climatic conditions such as extreme temperatures, droughts, or excessive rainfall.

Indexed as

Climate-smart agricultureCrop product managementGood agricultural practicesSmart farming

Identifiers

PMID41813758
PMCPMC13103075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.