ArticleScientific reports2026
Damping factor estimation of damped complex sinusoidal signals using a maximum likelihood approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents an approximate Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimation framework for estimating the damping factor in exponentially decaying complex sinusoidal signals. We derive a closed-form approximate ML estimator, explicitly noting its validity for small damping factors. Its efficiency is assessed through the derivation of the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB), which serves as the theoretical benchmark for estimator performance. Analytical proof demonstrates that the proposed approximate ML estimator achieves the CRLB under small-damping conditions, confirming its statistical efficiency and optimality. The performance of the estimator is evaluated by analyzing its behavior with respect to critical system parameters such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), sample size, signal amplitude, and damping intensity. Our analysis reveals several fundamental relationships: estimation accuracy improves with increasing SNR and a larger sample size, confirming that the approximate ML estimator effectively utilizes additional information. Furthermore, the empirical variance of the approximate ML estimator converges to the CRLB, validating its efficiency. These findings yield practical guidelines for system designers. We establish that weakly damped signals can achieve satisfactory accuracy with moderate resources, whereas strongly damped scenarios necessitate substantially enhanced signal conditions. The proposed framework provides optimal estimation performance while also achieving significantly reduced computational complexity. This combination makes it particularly suitable for applications requiring rapid damping parameter extraction, such as structural health monitoring, radar systems, and vibration analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.