ArticleScientific reports2026
The association between anthropometric indices with non-alcoholic fatty liver in the Azar cohort population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Based on the findings of previous studies, inconsistencies persist in the literature regarding the most reliable anthropometric indices for screening non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the most effective anthropometric indices for predicting NAFLD in the Azar cohort population. In this cross-sectional study, data from the Azar cohort study were utilized. Various anthropometric indices, including visceral adiposity index (VAI), weight-adjusted waist index (WWI), abdominal volume index (AVI), body adiposity index (BAI), body roundness index (BRI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), were calculated for 14,915 participants. We categorized anthropometric measurements into two groups: conventional and novel anthropometric indices. Conventional indices include body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), wrist circumference (WrC), hip circumference (HC), WHR, WHtR, and novel indices include BRI, ABI, AVI, VAI, and WWI. Our findings indicated that all conventional and novel anthropometric indices were significantly associated with NAFLD. The highest odd for NAFLD was WHtR ≥ 0.5 (4.76), then BMI ≥ 25 (3.27), followed by WHR and WC (2.79, 2.65 respectively). A comparison of the odds of conventional and novel anthropometric indices for NAFLD revealed that the odds for BMI, WhtR, WHR and WC are higher than those for the novel indices. While the most sensitive AUC outcomes for screening NAFLD were observed for the AVI (80.80) and BRI (79.01). The AVI and BRI cut-off points for determining NAFLD were established at 17.31 for AVI and 4.85 for BRI. Ultimately, BMI, WC, WHR, AVI, BRI, and VAI were the most effective anthropometric indices for predicting NAFLD in the Azar cohort population. In conclusion, our study suggests that novel anthropometric indices might be useful markers for detecting NAFLD in adults, alongside conventional anthropometric measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.