Trial reportScientific reports2026
Return to work among self-employed breast cancer survivors from the CANTO cohort.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01993498 (A Prospective Cohort to Investigate Survivorship Issues in Patients With Early Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Cohort to Investigate Survivorship Issues in Patients With Early Cancer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess return to work (RTW) after breast cancer (BC) by baseline employment status. Using data from the CANTO cohort (NCT01993498), we examined RTW among women below age 57 at BC diagnosis 2 and 4 years after BC diagnosis. We also assessed continuous work between years 2 and 4 post-diagnosis. Poisson regression models investigated associations between baseline employment (self-employed vs. employees) and RTW outcomes, adjusting for clinical, sociodemographic, and work-related factors and quality of life. We used education (above high school; high school or lower) as a proxy to further distinguish between white collar self-employees vs. blue collar self-employees (vs. employees). About 8% of women were self-employed at diagnosis. RTW was slightly higher among the self-employed compared to employees 2 years (N = 3178; PR = 1.04, 95%CI 0.98–1.10) and 4 years after diagnosis (N = 2329; PR = 1.05, 0.99–1.12). This effect was limited to white collar self-employed women. Among those who returned to work 2 years after diagnosis (N = 1683), self-employed women showed a 1.15 (1.01–1.31) higher prevalence of continuous work until year 4 post-diagnosis than employees. Self-employed women do not strongly differ from employees when assessing RTW at specific time points, however once returned to work, they experience fewer work interruptions than employees. This was observed in adjusted models, showing the intrinsic importance of job status in the RTW process. These findings highlight the importance of viewing RTW as an ongoing process, in order to provide appropriate and sustained support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.