ArticleScientific reports2026
Rethinking therapsid phylogeny through Bayesian and cladistic approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Therapsids are early-diverging synapsids that thrived during the Permian and Triassic periods, and ultimately gave rise to mammals. They include six major groups, which already exhibited considerable diversity at their first appearance in the fossil record. Their early to middle Permian origins remain poorly understood due to a scarcity of fossils with clear therapsid morphology in the early Permian and the presence of an interval of poor fossil preservation near the early to middle Permian boundary (Olson’s Gap). This limits our insight into the phylogenetic relationships among the main middle Permian groups. This study presents a novel approach to therapsid phylogeny, using probabilistic frameworks. In performing a phylogenetic analysis based exclusively on cranial characters, using both RevBayes and MrBayes, this study challenges understanding of the early diversification of Therapsida. We recover Neotherapsida, with Anomodontia branching as the sister taxon to Theriodontia. Biarmosuchia and Dinocephalia form a clade. The positions of taxa such as Sinophoneus and Biseridens are reconsidered. The application of Fossilized Birth-Death models suggests that while Therapsida originated in the early Permian, currently known therapsid groups diversified around 281 to 272 million years ago and subsequently underwent rapid radiation into five clades: Biarmosuchia, Dinocephalia, Anomodontia, Gorgonopsia, and Eutheriodontia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.