ArticleChinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi2026
Chinese expert consensus on the prehospital management of major trauma.
Article in Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction and verification of an early warning model for hypothermia in emergency trauma patients based on the random forest method.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To standardize the key techniques and protocols of prehospital emergency care for major trauma in China, and to improve the quality and efficiency of treatment, a multidisciplinary panel of experts in emergency medicine, trauma care, and prehospital rescue was organized to form an expert committee and a core working group. This initiative was co-sponsored by the Trauma Emergency and Multiple Trauma Group of the Trauma Society of the Chinese Medical Association, the Youth Group of the Disaster Medicine Society of the Chinese Medical Association, and the Combat and Trauma Care Specialty Alliance of Army Hospitals. The group systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Biology, Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and VIP Information to collect relevant guidelines, systematic reviews, and clinical studies. Based on evidence-based findings and clinical practice scenarios, the consensus was drafted. Multiple rounds of consultation and voting were conducted, and a consensus meeting was held to resolve any disputed items. Ultimately, 16 recommendations were formulated addressing 14 core clinical questions in the prehospital management of severe trauma. The contents cover scene safety, rapid recognition and early warning of severe trauma, control of exsanguinating external hemorrhage (X), airway management (A), breathing management (B), circulation management (C), disability/neurologic assessment (D), exposure and temperature control (E), trauma in special populations (the elderly), immobilization and extrication, transport decision-making, prehospital-to-hospital handover, teamwork, and systematic training. This consensus strongly emphasizes the "xABCDE" assessment sequence and recommends key interventions such as the use of commercial tourniquets and wound packing for hemorrhage control, permissive hypotensive resuscitation, early administration of tranexamic acid, and the standardized application of pelvic binders. It also advocates the use of standardized communication models for prehospital-to-hospital handovers. This consensus provides prehospital emergency providers in China with a practical, evidence-based set of key techniques and protocols for severe trauma care, which will help promote the standardization of the prehospital trauma care system, support the development of a high-quality national prehospital trauma care system, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.