Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41813423›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2026

Landscape heterogeneity affects developmental and dispersal-related traits of a butterfly in agricultural landscapes.

Franziska Deppe, Emily Breuer, Inka Hofmann, Nicla Koch, Lara Näckel, Josua Nowak, Philip Carlo Plänker, Anna-Lena Schmitz, Lisa Schroeder, Anna Spitzlei and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Landscape heterogeneity affects developmental and dispersal-related traits of a butterfly in agricultural landscapes.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Franziska DeppeInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9550-4962
Emily BreuerInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Inka HofmannInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Nicla KochInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Lara NäckelInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Josua NowakInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Philip Carlo PlänkerInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Anna-Lena SchmitzInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Lisa SchroederInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Anna SpitzleiInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Paula VetterInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Lukas WassongInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Stefanie WeichInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Michael WeingartInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Luisa WittkampInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Mine YilmazerInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Klaus FischerInstitute for Integrated Natural Sciences, Zoology, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG FI 846/14-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The loss and fragmentation of natural habitats due to the intensification of agricultural land use have detrimental impacts on the biodiversity of arthropods. The reduction of natural habitats results in a decreased availability of essential resources, which may select for rapid development and phenotypes enhancing dispersal ability. We here compared replicated populations of the butterfly Coenonympha pamphilus in field-caught females and their laboratory-reared offspring across two landscape types: highly fragmented and intensified "modern" and less fragmented "traditional" agricultural landscapes. We also examined the effects of food stress and landscape parameters representing compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity on intraspecific trait variation at different spatial scales. The differences between the two landscape types in butterfly traits were nonsignificant throughout, but both field-caught females and their offspring exhibited various responses to the measured landscape parameters. In particular, landscapes with (1) high heterogeneity of habitat patches (i.e., relatively smaller grassland patches with high boundary length), (2) higher proportion of non-crop habitats (i.e., grassland, forests, and woodland), and (3) lower proportion of crop fields seemed to select for phenotypes enhancing dispersal ability. Flight propensity of male offspring was increased under food stress, indicating plastic responses to resource scarcity. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the compositional and configurational landscape heterogeneity, namely parameters indicative of agricultural intensification, select for enhanced dispersal in C. pamphilus. As higher investment in dispersal often comes at a cost to reproduction, such trait shifts may reduce population viability, which may have important implications for insect declines in agricultural landscapes.

Indexed as

AgricultureAnimal DistributionButterfliesEcosystemAnimalsFemaleMaleagricultural intensificationCoenonympha pamphilusfood stresshabitat fragmentationinsect declineslandscape configurationlife history traitspopulation responses

Identifiers

PMID41813423
PMCPMC12979024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.