ArticleJMIR medical education2026
Development of a Deep Learning-Based Feedback Model to Assist Medical Students Learning Renal Ultrasound Acquisition: Mixed Methods Study.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Point-of-care ultrasound training is being increasingly integrated into undergraduate medical education, leading to a substantial demand for trained faculty to provide instruction and feedback. Objective: This study aimed to develop an adjunct tool, a deep learning-based feedback model, to facilitate student learning. Methods: Renal ultrasound images (N=2807) were used to train a cascaded deep learning-based feedback model that classified images into three categories: optimal, suboptimal, and incorrect. Suboptimal images were further subcategorized as images with artifact, incorrect gain, and/or incorrect positioning. The model was deployed among year 5 medical students receiving bedside ultrasound training, who were invited to upload renal ultrasound images to an online platform for automated image quality grading and feedback. A mixed methods analysis was used to evaluate students' learning experience. Focus group interviews were organized to qualitatively analyze the successes and challenges of implementation. Quantitative analysis was based on responses to a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire and performance on the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Objective structured clinical examination scores were compared with mean OSCE scores from the 2 years preceding implementation of the deep learning-based feedback model. Results: Focus group interviews identified that the deep learning-based feedback model encouraged self-regulated learning but also recognized that discordant curricular design and hardware limitations impeded its use. The 11-item online questionnaire had a response rate of 42.4% (98/231 students). Among respondents, 32% (31/98) to 48% (47/98) found the model helpful in assisting ultrasound training (Likert score of 4-5 for items 1-3), while 49% (48/98) to 76% (74/98) were satisfied with its usability and their interaction with the model (Likert score of 4-5 for items 4-11). The mean OSCE score was 9.73 (SD 0.76) out of 10, compared with mean scores of 9.35 (SD 1.03; P=.06) and 9.45 (SD 0.97; P=.15) out of 10 in the 2 individual years preceding implementation of the model. Conclusions: A cascaded deep learning-based feedback model was developed and deployed among year 5 medical students receiving bedside ultrasound training, with positive learner responses and enhanced self-regulated learning. The innovation was associated with increased student engagement and improved ultrasound skill acquisition among novice learners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.