ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Implementing Wound Hygiene in the Italian Healthcare Context: Expert Recommendations for the Management of Venous Leg Ulcers.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Vicious Cycle of Biofilm, Host Inflammation and Microvascular Insufficiency in Venous Leg Ulcers.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Chinese expert consensus on wound repair of venous leg ulcers (2025 edition).Military Medical Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 'Wound Hygiene Italia' project was designed to provide expert-driven recommendations for the assessment, management and monitoring of venous leg ulcers, tailored to diverse settings of care (hospital, ambulatory and home care). The recommendations, developed by a multidisciplinary panel, emphasise the implementation of the Wound Hygiene strategy, a systematic approach targeting biofilm as a primary barrier to wound healing. Wound management is structured around four steps: cleansing, debridement, edge refashioning and dressing selection adapted to the wound bed characteristics, care setting and clinical capabilities, embedded in a holistic approach through comprehensive patient assessment and monitoring of overall well-being. The findings highlight the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration, standardised tools and continuous patient monitoring, as assessed by objective metrics, such as wound size measurements and photographic documentation. Effective communication with patients and caregivers is also essential to ensure treatment adherence and foster trust in the care process. This framework integrates evidence-based practices to optimise outcomes and patient quality of life. By addressing both clinical and psychosocial factors, the recommendations promote a holistic, patient-centred approach that underscores the importance of education, structured follow-ups and tailored interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.