ArticleJMIR infodemiology2026
Audience-Specific Health Communication: Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Maria Ciência AI-Assisted Knowledge Translation Tool.
Article in JMIR infodemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing evidence-informed policy: outcomes of the global research agenda on knowledge translation.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Scientific misinformation remains a major barrier to effective health communication. Bridging the gap between academic research and public understanding requires tools that simplify scientific language and adapt content to diverse audiences. Objective: This study presents Maria Ciência (LPCT-IGM), a specialized GPT-based assistant for science communication. The tool supports researchers in translating peer-reviewed scientific findings through simple prompts into accessible, ethically appropriate materials tailored for children, the general public, health professionals, and policymakers. Methods: The tool was configured using prompt engineering techniques and guided by curated reference materials on inclusive and nonstigmatizing scientific language. Materials derived from 47 public health papers resulted in 188 outputs, which were assessed by 121 evaluators using 4 criteria: clarity, level of detail, language suitability, and content quality. In addition, outputs generated by Maria Ciência were compared with those produced by a base large language model and with human-written science communication materials. Readability and linguistic accessibility were assessed using multiple established metrics. Results: Worldwide, mean scores were high: clarity (4.90), language suitability (4.78), content quality (4.72), and level of detail (4.56), on a 5-point scale. Materials for children and the general public consistently achieved the highest ratings across all criteria. A targeted comparison with the base large language model demonstrated superior performance of Maria Ciência in contextual stability. Readability analyses indicated that Maria Ciência's outputs were significantly more accessible than human-written texts, while maintaining high legibility classifications. Conclusions: Maria Ciência demonstrates the potential of artificial intelligence-assisted tools to enhance knowledge translation and counter scientific misinformation by producing scalable, audience-specific content that balances accessibility and informational integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.