ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Leveraging Social Media to Achieve Population-Level Reach of Lung Cancer Screening-Eligible Individuals: A RE-AIM Framework Perspective.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Leveraging Social Media to Achieve Population-Level Reach of Lung Cancer Screening-Eligible Individuals: A RE-AIM Framework Perspective.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Annual lung cancer screening (LCS) can decrease lung cancer-related mortality by finding cancer at earlier, more treatable stages, yet uptake remains abysmally low in the United States, especially among adults who seldom interact with the health system. Many eligible individuals are unaware that LCS exists, underscoring the critical need for scalable, population-level communication strategies that increase awareness and engagement. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate reach, as defined by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework, as the extent to which the target population comes in contact with a social media-based strategy, Facebook-targeted advertisement (FBTA), designed to connect LCS-eligible individuals in the United States with a digital health communication message. The advertisement served as a digital outreach strategy for promoting engagement with LungTalk, an evidence-based intervention aimed at increasing awareness and informed decision-making about LCS. Methods: As part of the INSPIRE-Lung Study (INnovating Social Media for Prevention: LUNG Cancer Screening Awareness, Knowledge, and Uptake), 5 FBTA campaigns were launched over a 79-day period throughout the United States. Advertisements targeted adults aged 50-80 years with interests related to smoking or smoking cessation and linked to a study website where participants could complete an eligibility screener and learn more about the trial. Facebook analytics were used to assess reach, defined by the number, proportion, and demographic characteristics of individuals exposed to and interacting with FBTA content. Key metrics included total reach, impressions, link clicks, and cost-efficiency. Results: The FBTA campaigns reached 1,048,191 unique users and generated 3,109,482 impressions (total advertisement displays, including repeat exposures to the same user). A total of 24,816 individuals clicked on the advertisements (2.37% click-through rate), and 7117 completed the eligibility screener. Of those eligible, 1272 (17.9%) met lung screening criteria, and of these, 483 (38% participation rate) enrolled in the trial. The cost per click was US $0.40, and the cost per enrolled participant was US $19.46. Individuals reached via FBTA were demographically diverse and included many who may be disconnected from traditional health care systems. Conclusions: FBTA is a scalable, cost-effective strategy to achieve population-level reach of LCS-eligible adults. By conceptualizing reach as exposure to an upstream digital message rather than enrollment alone, this study illustrates how social media can broaden population access to evidence-based cancer prevention tools such as LungTalk. Future research should explore embedding intervention content directly into social media platforms and tracking downstream clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.