ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2026
Cancer and all-cause mortality among United States union poultry workers.
Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSeveral industry-specific hazards are present in the poultry working environment. It is not well known whether risk factors unique to poultry working increase all-cause and cancer mortality relative to other industry types. The study objective was to compare all-cause and cancer mortality among poultry workers to non-poultry food workers.
methodsOccupational data for 30 411 poultry and 16 405 non-poultry workers were obtained from United Food and Commercial Workers union records and matched to the National Death Index up to 31 December 2019 to conduct a retrospective cohort study. Unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and their 95% CIs from time-stratified Cox proportional hazard regression models were run to compare all-cause and cancer mortality among poultry and non-poultry workers.
resultsAcross the full cohort, no statistically significant elevation in all-cause or cancer mortality among poultry workers was observed (all-cause: aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.01; cancer: aHR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.13); however, time-period sensitivity was evident. After accounting for calendar time, poultry workers hired before 1960 had a 62% greater cancer mortality hazard compared with non-poultry workers (aHR 1.62, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.11). Poultry workers hired between 1980 and 1989 had a 59% (aHR 1.59, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.79) and 86% (aHR 1.86, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.48) greater all-cause and cancer mortality risk, respectively.
conclusionsUnion poultry workers hired in the United States during the 20th century faced greater all-cause and cancer mortality compared with non-poultry workers; however, this elevation was period-sensitive, varying by employment start date.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.