Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41813047›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Optimising Primary thErapy in pRimAry biliary cholangitis (OPERA): protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of enhanced primary therapy with obeticholic acid.

Sarah Dunn, Lysbeth Evans, Ciara Kennedy, Rebecca Wafer, Sam Moody, Faye Wolstenhulme, Emma Burton, Ann Breeze Konkoth, Holly Fisher, Thomas Chadwick and 16 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Sarah DunnNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1901-3931
Lysbeth EvansNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7729-755X
Ciara KennedyNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2987-0977
Rebecca WaferNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1139-3937
Sam MoodyNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3217-2181
Faye WolstenhulmeNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4086-7931
Emma BurtonNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1174-7892
Ann Breeze KonkothNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1917-7589
Holly FisherPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8389-9140
Thomas ChadwickNewcastle University Institute for Health and Society, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7995-0302
Annie BanhamPPIE, Newcastle upon tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7302-8595
Fiona HalePPIE, Newcastle upon tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-7464
Mo ChristiePBC Foundation, Edinburgh, UK.
Stephen T BarclayGlasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0415-785X
Jessica DysonNewcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6733-5225
Rachel SmithCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8303-959X
Guruprasad AithalWofson Digestive Disease Centre, Queens Medical Centre University Hospital, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3924-4830
Emma CulverOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9644-8392
Richard AspinallPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5208-8185
Doug ThorburnDepartment of Hepatology, Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5610-5448
Michael HeneghanInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5441-9064
Helen C HancockNewcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1494-8551
Palak TrivediUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4009-8087
George MellsCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7962-5286
James WasonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4691-126X
David E J JonesNIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre and Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK David.Jones@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0083-5564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrimary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare chronic cholestatic disease that despite current therapy has significant ongoing unmet needs, including risks of cirrhosis and life-impairing symptoms. The current treatment approach is a step-up model, wherein first-line therapy, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), is given for a minimum of 12 months before the addition of second-line therapy is considered for non-responding patients. This 'waiting to fail' approach, focused on the needs of low-risk patients, allows, we postulate, a key process of biliary epithelial cell (BEC) senescence to become established, driving accelerated bile duct loss and aggressive disease. Preclinical mouse modelling has shown that early use of the farnesoid X receptor agonist obeticholic acid (OCA), currently only used as second-line therapy following UDCA failure, reverses BEC senescence, changing the clinical course of disease. Here, we describe the design of the Optimising Primary thErapy in pRimAry biliary cholangitis (OPERA) trial. The aim of OPERA is to explore a new paradigm for disease-modifying treatment of PBC: risk-informed early treatment stratification, with patients at increased risk offered UDCA and OCA combination with the goal of complete biochemical remission. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: OPERA is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of OCA in combination with UDCA, as first-line treatment for high-risk PBC. This is a multicentre trial in England, which will be undertaken in specialist clinics in secondary/tertiary referral centres (or as per local set up). These centres will be specialists in the area of PBC management and will manage patients from across their local region. OPERA will recruit and randomise 106 adults, within 6 months of PBC diagnosis, who are at an enhanced risk of non-response to standard first-line therapy, between either: (1) UDCA and OCA or (2) UDCA and matched placebo in a 1:1 ratio. The primary efficacy outcome measure is the percentage of participants showing normalisation of serum alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin values at 26 weeks (disease remission). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Favourable ethical opinion was received from London - Riverside Research Ethics Committee (reference: 22/LO/0878). Potential participants will be fully informed of their rights and the benefits and harms of the trial by the research team before giving informed consent to participate in the trial. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications, at national and international conferences, in peer-reviewed journals and to participants and the public (using lay language). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN17176388.

Indexed as

Chenodeoxycholic AcidCholagogues and CholereticsLiver Cirrhosis, BiliaryUrsodeoxycholic AcidDouble-Blind MethodHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptor, Farnesoid X-ActivatedChenodeoxycholic AcidCholagogues and Cholereticsobeticholic acidReceptor, Farnesoid X-ActivatedUrsodeoxycholic AcidClinical ProtocolsClinical TrialDisease ManagementHepatobiliary diseaseHepatologyRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID41813047
PMCPMC12983740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.