ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2026
Differences in cognitive performance and neuroanatomy according to Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology.
Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of predementia stages indicates an increased risk of progression to dementia. The Amyloid, Tau, and Neurodegeneration AT(N) classification considers measurements of altered proteins and the presence of neurodegeneration to classify the risk groups regarding the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The cognitive and anatomical characteristics of the patients in the predementia stage according to the AT(N) classification are not fully understood.To investigate whether there are differences in the clinical and anatomical profiles among older adults in the predementia stage according to the ATN classification, and to investigate the associations involving cognition and cortical thickness and subcortical volume in the AT(N) groups.In total, 72 older adults with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment were allocated to groups according to the AT(N) classification (AD continuum: n = 37; suspected non-AD pathophysiology: n = 8; normal biomarkers: n = 27). The participants were investigated through cognitive tests, magnetic resonance imaging scans, and cerebrospinal fluid analyses. We used multivariate and univariate analyses with post-hoc testing to verify differences among groups. In addition, linear regressions were performed to verify the interactions involving cognition and gray matter metrics.The suspected non-AD pathophysiology group showed worse performance in attention/executive function than the AD continuum and normal biomarkers groups (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.