ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2026
Barriers to implementing a pharmacist-led COPD CARE bundle in rural settings: a qualitative evaluation.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- COPD CARE Academy: Design of Purposeful Training Guided by Implementation Strategies.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPatients living in rural settings are among the least likely to receive care, contributing to excess deaths in rural communities from respiratory conditions. We examine barriers that impede implementation of a care bundle for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management that was widely implemented across rural communities in the USA.
setting17 rural medical centres implementing the care bundle in the US Department of Veteran Affairs (VA). Medical centres were located across 13 states, with 3 VA medical centres (VAMC) in the Southeast, 4 in the South, 9 in the Midwest and 1 in the Northwest.
participantsClinician participants engaged in programme implementation included pharmacy leaders, hired clinical pharmacists, nurse care managers and pharmacy technicians. Participation was offered to all clinicians engaged in the implementation process and was voluntary. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: This evaluation identifies barriers that impede implementation of a care bundle for COPD management. To guide our analysis, we identified challenges that strongly aligned with work system factors within the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) 2.0 model.
resultsChallenges experienced during the implementation of a COPD service in rural settings included (1) limited staff availability, (2) fragmentation of care, (3) technology challenges, (4) limited referral opportunities, (5) competing demands on pharmacist time and (6) clinician apprehension regarding their ability to manage a new disease state.
conclusionsThis evaluation furthers what is understood regarding barriers to implementing care bundles within rural healthcare contexts. Our findings suggested that clinicians in rural settings felt constrained in their ability to take on new tasks and expand their practice models due to staffing shortages and heavy workload demands. Some clinicians reported approaches they used to address barriers they encountered, such as leveraging relationships with other healthcare practitioners to enhance communication and minimise technology limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.