Trial reportESMO open2026
A randomized phase III clinical trial of weekly versus tri-weekly cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: results of the TACO (GCIG/KGOG 1027/THAI 2012) study.
Trial report in ESMO open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy; however, the optimal dose and dosing schedule of cisplatin remain debated. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of weekly cisplatin at 40 mg/m PATIENTS AND
methodsIn this prospective, randomized clinical trial, we enrolled 314 patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer, randomly assigning them in a 1 : 1 ratio into two arms. The weekly arm received a weekly dose of 40 mg/m
resultsChemotherapy delay was more frequent in the weekly arm than in the tri-weekly arm (P = 0.008). However, the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate between the two arms did not significantly differ (78.7% in the weekly arm, 84.1% in the tri-weekly arm; hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.39-1.32, P = 0.28). The pattern of recurrence did not differ significantly between the two arms. Grade 3 and 4 hematological toxicities occurred less frequently in the tri-weekly arm (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the tri-weekly arm had better QOL scores across several domains compared with the weekly arm.
conclusionIn this study, tri-weekly cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy was not statistically superior to a weekly schedule in terms of survival outcomes for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. However, the tri-weekly regimen exhibited a more favorable toxicity profile and improved QOL compared with the weekly regimen. These results suggest tri-weekly cisplatin administration as a feasible alternative for chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.