ArticleInternational dental journal2026
Corporate Dentistry in the European Union: Legal Frameworks and Structural Characteristics.
Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimsThe aim of this study was to collect and analyze country-specific information on corporate dental chains in the European Union, with a particular focus on their prevalence, organizational structures, business models, and legal frameworks, as well as the role of national dental associations and chambers in this context.
methodsA standardized questionnaire developed by the Council of European Dentists (CED) was distributed to its national dental associations from EU member states, Iceland, Norway, the United Kingdom of Great Britian and Northern Ireland, and Switzerland.
resultsThe response rate was 86.6% (26/30). In 22 countries (84.6%), non-dentists can own a dental practice; 4 countries prohibit such ownership. Dental chains are permitted in 24 (92.3%) and present in 21 countries (80.7%). In 9 countries (34.6%), dental chains not exclusively owned by dentists must include a dentist in management. Since 2018, 11 countries (42.3%) report an increase of dentists working in chains, while 5 (19.2%) observed no change. Dental chains mainly operate in large cities (n = 12; 46.2%). Their preferred models are opening new practices (n = 9; 34.6%) or acquiring existing ones (n = 8; 30.8%). Unethical conduct toward patients by dental chains was observed in 5 countries (19.2%), while 6 countries (23.1%) reported unsatisfactory, poor working conditions and employment contracts for dentists.
conclusionThe European dental care sector is undergoing structural transformation. While dental chains are permitted in most countries, legal clarity and professional oversight remain limited. Reports of unethical conduct and inadequate working conditions highlight the need for further research. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The increasing presence of dental chains in Europe highlights regulatory gaps and ethical concerns. This study emphasizes the importance of clear legal frameworks and professional oversight to maintain high standards in patient care, particularly as market-driven models reshape dental service delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.