ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2026
Implicit Bias and Recognition of Biases Among Vascular Surgeons.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionImplicit bias can influence behavior and decision-making, such as treatment decisions in clinical settings. Given documented Black-White disparities in vascular care, the purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence and degree of implicit bias and recognition of bias among vascular surgeons.
methodsThe sample included vascular surgeons in the Vascular Quality Initiative. Participants completed a survey of demographic questions, race implicit association test, and six bias recognition questions. Implicit bias was categorized as no preference, or slight, moderate, or strong pro-White or pro-Black. We stratified implicit and bias recognition findings by physician race/ethnicity, sex, years of experience, and region; and examined the relationship between implicit bias and bias recognition.
resultsThe survey was completed by 304 participants. Most participants (71.6%) showed a pro-White bias with 73.0% of this group in moderate and strong categories. Bias magnitude varied based on physician race/ethnicity, years of experience, and region. Although 77.5% of respondents showed recognition of biases, of those whose results showed lack of recognition, 67.8% had moderate or strong bias. Women were more likely than men to report recognition of biases and of the potential impact of bias on decision-making.
conclusionsMost people have some level of implicit bias, developed from early life reinforcements, social stereotypes, and learned experiences. However, these are important findings in a profession that takes care of a high proportion of individuals from structurally vulnerable groups. Given the lack of association between implicit bias and recognition of biases, recognition may be an important first step to minimize documented disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.