ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2026
Ephaptic coupling and power fluctuations in depression.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The initial therapeutic exposure to Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) during implantation surgery has reproducible acute behavioral effects that carry over without further stimulation. We analyzed local field potential (LFP) data from the first month following brief therapeutic intraoperative DBS. Data were recorded from the subcallosal cingulate cortex. During this month, no further stimulation was applied. Recent studies have identified beta power fluctuations in LFP data as an acute putative depression biomarker of this exposure. However, a detailed description of neural dynamics underlying brain power fluctuations is missing. Here, we consider how these fluctuations are related to brain itinerancy, that is, neural activity changes between stable and unstable states. We also provide a proof of principle study that these dynamics can be described using 2 new dynamical systems measures: instability frequency and relative wandering time. These capture interactions between neural activity and the mesoscale oscillatory electric fields generated by it. The 2 measures seem to split low vs. high Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores within a small patient cohort. They are motivated by the cytoelectric coupling hypothesis, which suggests that efficient information processing results from mesoscale electric fields and that the re-emergence of depression symptoms might result from altered electric fields. Whether the new measures reflect general mechanisms of rapid antidepressant action remains to be tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.