ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2026
The representation of speech conversations in the human auditory cortex: role of social and semantic factors.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human social nature has shaped auditory perception, as hearing is essential for navigating social interactions, especially when listening to others' conversations. While much research has examined how the brain processes isolated words or sentences, far less is known about how broader social and semantic contexts influence speech comprehension. We used 7 T fMRI to examine neural responses while participants listened to two-speaker dialogues versus single-speaker monologues, presented either in intact or sentence-scrambled order. Twenty-four healthy young adults listened to AI-generated five-sentence conversations designed to independently manipulate social (dialogue vs. monologue) and semantic (intact vs. sentence-scrambled) contexts. Whole-brain univariate analyses revealed increased activity for scrambled compared to intact conversations in the left superior temporal sulcus (STS), consistent with predictive-coding models. Although social context alone showed no main effect, an interaction emerged: semantic disruption elicited stronger responses in dialogues than monologues within the STS. Multivariate pattern analyses further revealed higher classification accuracy of individual sentences within dialogues vs. monologues, particularly in the left anterior STS and inferior frontal gyrus, suggesting that social context enhances linguistic encoding. Together, these findings indicate that the left STS integrates both semantic and social information, supporting predictive and context-sensitive mechanisms crucial for real-world verbal communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.